The Geysers

Potential Improvements to Existing Geothermal Facilities in California

Basic Information
Author: 
Lovekin, J.W.
Author: 
Sanyal, S.K.
Author: 
Sener, A.C.
Author: 
Tiangco, V.
Author: 
Gutiérrez-Santana, P
Description: 
This paper summarizes the results of a recent study (the Facilities Improvement Report) performed with funding by the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) program of the California Energy Commission (CEC). The Facilities Improvement Report describes potential improvements to 45 existing power plants in 7 currently producing geothermal fields in California. The improvements are of two general types: improvements in resource supply and improvements in surface facilities. To resolve inconsistencies in reported plant capacities, distinctions are made between original capacity, electromechanical capacity, 2005 capacity (which takes into account resource limitations), and actual annual average power. The total electro-mechanical capacity of the geothermal plants in California is about 2,650 MW-gross, and the 2005 capacity is about 1,850 MW-gross (1,600 MW-net).
Publication Date: 
Sunday, January 1, 2006
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Lovekin_2006-1.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
42.1821
South bounding latitude: 
32.4198
West bounding longitude: 
-124.805
East bounding longitude: 
-113.818
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Lovekin, J.W., Sanyal, S.K., Sener, A.C., Tiangco, V., and Gutiérrez-Santana, P., 2006. Potential Improvements to Existing Geothermal Facilities in California. GeothermEx, Inc.,Richmond, California. George Washington University. California Energy Commission.

Potential for "Enhanced Geothermal Systems" In The Western United States

Basic Information
Author: 
Sass, J.H.
Author: 
Robertson-Tait, Ann
Description: 
Most presently active or contemplated hot dry rock (HDR) projects vary significantly from the original HDR concept of creating an engineered reservoir in an effectively impermeable medium. Instead, they form part of a spectrum of geothermal resources that exhibit less-than-commercial productivity, but are not completely impermeable. A new working definition, "Enhanced Geothermal Systems" (EGS), is now being used to describe all but the high-grade hydrothermal portion of the geothermal resource spectrum. To promote the commercial development of these lower permeability and/or fluid-deficient resources, EGS research and development in the U.S. during the next few years is likely to include field experiments that target hot, low permeability zones within or near the margins of commercially developed hydrothermal systems. These systems are located in areas of elevated regional heat flow (Cascade Range, Basin and Range Province, Salton Trough, California Coast Ranges and Rio Grande Rift Zone), where temperatures of 250°C can be reached at depths of 4 km or less. Potential sites for EGS experiments were identified with the objective of yielding immediate benefits to the geothermal industry while also contributing to the commercial development of an incrementally broader range of geothermal resources.
Publication Date: 
Thursday, January 1, 1998
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Robertson-Tait_1998-1.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
38.9106
South bounding latitude: 
34.6901
West bounding longitude: 
-123.047
East bounding longitude: 
-116.719
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
John H. Sass and Ann Robertson-Tait, 1998. POTENTIAL FOR "ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS" IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES. GeothermEx, Inc.,Richmond, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona

Numerical Reservoir-Wellbore-Pipeline Simulation Model of The Geysers Geothermal Field, California, USA

Basic Information
Author: 
Butler, S.J.
Author: 
Enedy, S.L.
Description: 
The Geysers geothermal field, located in Lake, Sonoma, and Mendocino Counties, California is the largest developed geothermal system in the world. Electric power generation started at The Geysers in 1960 with a 12 MW (gross) plant. The total installed capacity in the field peaked in 1989 at 2,043 MW. As more and more power plants were built during the 1980s and net mass withdrawals increased, reservoir pressures at The Geysers declined, eventually resulting in steam shortfalls and declining generation levels. This net withdraw is due to the fact that geothermal power plants at The Geysers typically lose about 70% to 80% of produced mass to evaporation in cooling towers, with the balance of mass being returned to the reservoir through injection of steam condensate.
Publication Date: 
Friday, January 1, 2010
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/file_4a8dac7b0f089.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
40.1141
South bounding latitude: 
38.1025
West bounding longitude: 
-123.97
East bounding longitude: 
-122.19
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Roger W. Greensfelder, 2010. Numerical Reservoir-Wellbore-Pipeline Simulation Model of The Geysers Geothermal Field, California, USA. GeothermEx, Inc., Richmond, California.

Design and Implementation of Steam Supply for the Western Geopower Unit 1 Project at the Geysers Geothermal Field, California

Basic Information
Author: 
Sanyal, S.K.
Author: 
Henneberger, R.C.
Author: 
Granados, E.E.
Author: 
Long, M.
Author: 
MacLeod, K.
Description: 
This paper presents the case history of the first significant expansion of the installed power capacity in two decades at The Geysers steam field (California), which has been producing commercial electric power for nearly 50 years. Western GeoPower Corporation is constructing a 35 MW (net) power plant at The Geysers, where the generation capacity today has declined to about 900 MW from its peak of 1,800 MW in 1987. A 62 MW (gross) plant was operated at the Western GeoPower site from 1979 to 1989 but was shut down because of a rapid decline in well productivity. The development of a new 35 MW plant at this site has become possible today because: (a) a long production history and a large amount of resource data are available; (b) a substantial infrastructure exists at the site; and (c) the augmented injection in The Geysers field with treated municipal effluent over the last decade has sharply reduced well productivity decline. All four production wells drilled to date for this expansion have proven commercial; three of the four wells have shown much higher productivity than is typical for The Geysers field today, the fourth one being about average.
Publication Date: 
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/file_4a8db1fb3fdcf.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
39.4217
South bounding latitude: 
37.4251
West bounding longitude: 
-123.992
East bounding longitude: 
-121.223
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
S. K. Sanyal, R. C. Henneberger, E. E. Granados,M. Long, and K. MacLeod, 2004.Design and Implementation of Steam Supply for the Western Geopower Unit 1 Project at the Geysers Geothermal Field, California. GeothermEx, Inc., Richmond, California. Western GeoPower Corporation, Vancouver, Canada

An Investigation of Productivity and Pressure Decline Trends in Geothermal Steam Reservoirs

Basic Information
Author: 
Sanyal, S.K.
Author: 
Butler, S.J.
Author: 
Brown, P.J.
Author: 
Goyal, K.P.
Author: 
Box, Tom
Description: 
This paper derives the relation between productivity and pressure decline trends in a geothermal steam reservoir. At all stages of a geothermal project, the economics is affected by the rate of productivity decline. The rate of pressure decline becomes a critical issue when the reservoir pressure declines to the point that wells have to be flowed wide open to supply the turbine; at that stage, maintaining reservoir pressure and well productivity by redistribution and/or augmentation of injection becomes a stratcgic issue in field management. Therefore, the issues considered in this paper have significant practical implications.
Publication Date: 
Saturday, January 1, 2000
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Sanyal_2000-5.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
42.1169
South bounding latitude: 
34.1099
West bounding longitude: 
-124.98
East bounding longitude: 
-114.609
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Sanyal, S.K., Butler, S.J., Brown, P.J., Goyal, K., and Box, T., 2000. An Investigation of Productivity and Pressure Decline Trends in Geothermal Steam Reservoirs. GeothermEx, Inc., Richmond, California. Calpine Corporation, Middletown, California
Syndicate content