Desert Peak

Tracer Testing at the Desert Peak EGS Project

Basic Information
Author: 
Rose, P.
Author: 
Leecaster, K.
Author: 
Drakos, P.
Author: 
Robertson-Tait, A.
Description: 
As part of the Desert Peak EGS project, tracer testing was conducted involving two existing injection wells at the Desert Peak geothermal field. The tracer data showed very strong returns from both injectors to one of the production wells, with much lower returns to the remaining producers. The tracer-swept pore volume was estimated using a first-moment analysis of the return-curve data.
Publication Date: 
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
39.8321
South bounding latitude: 
39.6801
West bounding longitude: 
-119.062
East bounding longitude: 
-118.825

Progress on the Desert Peak East EGS Project

Basic Information
Author: 
Robertson-Tait, A.
Author: 
Johnson, S.
Description: 
An industry-DOE cost-shared project is underway to evaluate the technical feasibility of developing an EGS power generation project on the eastern side of the Desert Peak geothermal field. An existing well (DP 23-1) is the focus of much of the Phase I investigation, including re-interpretation of lithology, acquisition and analysis of a well bore imaging log, conducting and analyzing a step-rate injection test, performing a "mini-frac" to determine the magnitude of the least principal stress, and re-completing the well in preparation for hydraulic stimulation in Phase II. In addition, numerical modeling has been undertaken to estimate heat recovery and make generation forecasts for various stimulated volumes and well configurations.
Publication Date: 
Saturday, January 1, 2005
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/file_4858299a2e4ab.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
39.9838
South bounding latitude: 
39.6674
West bounding longitude: 
-119.174
East bounding longitude: 
-118.754
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Ann Robertson-Tait, and Stuart Johnson, 2005. Progress on the Desert Peak East EGS Project. GeothermEx, Inc.,Richmond, California. ORMAT Nevada, Inc., Reno, Nevada

Progress and Future Plans at the Desert Peak East EGS Project

Basic Information
Author: 
Robertson-Tait, A.
Author: 
Morris, C.
Description: 
An industry-DOE cost-shared project is underway to evaluate the technical feasibility of developing an EGS power generation project on the eastern side of the Desert Peak geothermal field. Analysis of existing geological and geophysical data is complemented by new geologic mapping and gravity work in the Hot Springs Mountains undertaken by researchers with funding from the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy at the University of Nevada Reno (UNR). An existing well (DP 23-1) is the focus of much of the Phase I investigation, including re-interpretation of lithology, acquisition and analysis of a well bore imaging log, and conducting and analyzing a step-rate injection test. As of June 2003, the project is about half complete; results are summarized below. Phase I work remaining to modeling, numerical modeling and the development of a be completed includes conceptual detailed plan to guide upcoming field activities.
Publication Date: 
Sunday, February 2, 2003
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Robertson-Tait_2003-1.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
39.9564
South bounding latitude: 
39.6801
West bounding longitude: 
-119.224
East bounding longitude: 
-118.814
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Ann Robertson Tait, and Christy Morris, 2000. Progress and Future Plans at the Desert Peak East EGS Project. GeothermEx, Inc.,Richmond, California. ORMAT Nevada, Inc., Reno, Nevada

Is EGS Commercially Feasible?

Basic Information
Author: 
Sanyal, S.K.
Author: 
Morrow, J.W.
Author: 
Butler, S.J.
Author: 
Robertson-Tait, Ann
Description: 
This paper presents an evaluation of the cost of electric power from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), that is, reservoirs with sub-commercial permeability enhanced by hydraulic stimulation. The parameters in this exercise reflect the conditions encountered at the Desert Peak EGS project in Nevada, but the results should be applicable, at least qualitatively, to any EGS project. The approach taken is to : 1) use numerical simulation to evaluate energy recovery versus time over an assumed 30-year project life for various system configurations (number and spacing of wells, assumptions about stimulation effectiveness, etc; 2) estimate the levelized power cost for each configuration, based on capital cost, O&M cost, the cost of money and inflation rate (using Monte Carlo sampling to address uncertainties); 3) determining the sensitivity of levelized cost to the cost components, interest and inflation rates, and resource characteristics (maximum practical pumping rate, reservoir characteristics, and the depth to thereservoir at the site); and 4) estimating future EGS costs and considering the possible technology improvements that could be made by that time.
Publication Date: 
Monday, January 1, 2007
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Available Files: 
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Sanyal_2007-5.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
38.9106
South bounding latitude: 
34.5454
West bounding longitude: 
-123.047
East bounding longitude: 
-117.07
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Sanyal, S.K., Morrow, J.W., Butler, S.J., and Robertson-Tait, A., 2007. Is EGS Commercially Feasible? GeothermEx, Inc., Richmond, California.

An Analysis of Power Generation Prospects from Enhanced Geothermal Systems

Basic Information
Author: 
Sanyal, S.K.
Author: 
Butler, S.J.
Description: 
This paper presents an analysis of power generation prospects from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), specifically, reservoirs with subcommercial permeability enhanced by hydraulic stimulation. EGS is also known as “hot dry rock” or “hot fractured rock” systems. The performance under consideration here is the net electrical power delivered as a function of time over the 20-to-30 year life of a power plant. Although the parameters in this exercise generally reflect conditions encountered at the Desert Peak EGS project in the State of Nevada, United States, the conclusions are applicable, at least qualitatively, to any EGS project.
Publication Date: 
Saturday, January 1, 2005
Resource Language: 
English
Intelectual Originator Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Resource Information
Access Statement: 
Abstract available online at http://www.geothermex.com/files/Sanyal_2005-2.pdf For a copy of this paper please e-mail us at mw@geothermex.com
Resource Distribution Contact
Organization Name: 
GeothermEx, Inc.
Street Address: 
3260 Blume Drive,Suite 220
City: 
Richmond
State/Province: 
CA
Postal Code: 
94806
Country: 
United States
Phone: 
510-527-9876
Fax: 
510-527-8164
Geographic Extent
North bounding latitude: 
41.7245
South bounding latitude: 
34.1099
West bounding longitude: 
-124.805
East bounding longitude: 
-115.84
Previous Citation
Bibliographic Citation: 
Subir K. Sanyal and Steven J. Butle, 2005. An Analysis of Power Generation Prospects from Enhanced Geothermal Systems. GeothermEx, Inc., Richmond, California.
Syndicate content