This paper summarizes the results of a recent study (the Facilities Improvement Report) performed with funding by the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) program of the California Energy Commission (CEC). The Facilities Improvement Report describes potential improvements to 45 existing power plants in 7 currently producing geothermal fields in California. The improvements are of two general types: improvements in resource supply and improvements in surface facilities. To resolve inconsistencies in reported plant capacities, distinctions are made between original capacity, electromechanical capacity, 2005 capacity (which takes into account resource limitations), and actual annual average power. The total electro-mechanical capacity of the geothermal plants in California is about 2,650 MW-gross, and the 2005 capacity is about 1,850 MW-gross (1,600 MW-net).

Most presently active or contemplated hot dry rock (HDR) projects vary significantly from the original HDR concept of creating an engineered reservoir in an effectively impermeable medium. Instead, they form part of a spectrum of geothermal resources that exhibit less-than-commercial productivity, but are not completely impermeable. A new working definition, "Enhanced Geothermal Systems" (EGS), is now being used to describe all but the high-grade hydrothermal portion of the geothermal resource spectrum. To promote the commercial development of these lower permeability and/or fluid-deficient resources, EGS research and development in the U.S. during the next few years is likely to include field experiments that target hot, low permeability zones within or near the margins of commercially developed hydrothermal systems. These systems are located in areas of elevated regional heat flow (Cascade Range, Basin and Range Province, Salton Trough, California Coast Ranges and Rio Grande Rift Zone), where temperatures of 250°C can be reached at depths of 4 km or less. Potential sites for EGS experiments were identified with the objective of yielding immediate benefits to the geothermal industry while also contributing to the commercial development of an incrementally broader range of geothermal resources.

Advances in binary-cycle power and submersible pump technologies over the past two decades have made electric power generation from geothermal fields in the moderate temperature range (100° to 180°C) convincingly commercial. For geothermal water in this temperature range, binary-cycle is more efficient for power conversion than flash-cycle and pumping of wells is more efficient than self flowing. The lower temperature limit of 100°C is imposed by the limits of binary-cycle technology and the upper limit of 180°C is imposed by the limits of pump technology commercially available today. This paper is a case study of optimization of net power generation from such a field at Raft River, in the State of Idaho, United States.

The similarities and differences ill reservoir engineering in the geothermal and petroleum industries are not familiar to many. This unfamiliarity frequently leads to aberrant perception of the risks and rewards of geothermal development in the minds of developers and financiers who are accustomed to the petroleum industry but are new to geothermal. This paper is a comparative survey of the state-of-the-art of reservoir engineering in the two industries.

The Geysers geothermal field, located in Lake, Sonoma, and Mendocino Counties, California is the largest developed geothermal system in the world. Electric power generation started at The Geysers in 1960 with a 12 MW (gross) plant. The total installed capacity in the field peaked in 1989 at 2,043 MW. As more and more power plants were built during the 1980s and net mass withdrawals increased, reservoir pressures at The Geysers declined, eventually resulting in steam shortfalls and declining generation levels. This net withdraw is due to the fact that geothermal power plants at The Geysers typically lose about 70% to 80% of produced mass to evaporation in cooling towers, with the balance of mass being returned to the reservoir through injection of steam condensate.

A new analysis demonstrates a rough correlation between microseismicity with focal depths ~ 2 km and injection in one well located in the southeastern portion of the Geysers geothermal field (in and near Unit 13), confirming what Stark (1990) has shown for the area to the northwest. The abrupt onset of micro seismicity near well McKinley-5 early in 1980 follows the initiation of injection there by about three months. Until 1986, injection and numbers of earthquakes within 3000 feet of this well appear to be roughly correlated, with injection increases or decreases leading the rise or fall of microearthquake numbers. For the years after 1986, there seems to be no correlation between earthquake frequency and injection; this may be due to the overall decline of injection volumes in the well. A similar analysis was conducted for well Thorne-7, but no correlation is evident. However, after the start-up of injection in 1984, microseismicity near this well did become more continuous from month to month.

This paper investigates the practical range of net power capacity available from conventional and enhanced geothermal wells as a function of temperature and productivity index. For a temperature range of 100°C to 190°C, which is the operating temperature limit of presently available downhole pumps, wells are typically pumped and power is usually generated in a binary-cycle plant, and in rare cases in a flash-cycle or hybrid-cycle plant. In this temperature range, the net MW capacity of a well has an upper limit of about 7.3 MW, irrespective of how high the well’s productivity index is. This capacity limit cannot be improved unless technology can be improved to allow setting pumps deeper in the well than the current limit of 457m (1,500 feet) and pumping at a higher rate than the present limit of about 160 ℓ/s (2,500 gallons per minute). For resource temperatures greater than 190°C, wells must be self-flowed, and power is generated from such wells in a flash-cycle or hybrid-cycle plant. In the temperature range of 190°C to nearly 220°C a self-flowing well’s net power capacity (irrespective of its productivity index) is less than the maximum of 7.3 MW for a pumped well.

The U.S. Department of Interior has assigned to the US Geological Survey (USGS) the task of conducting an updated assessment of the geothermal resources in the United States. In that connection, we offer an objective analysis of the last such national assessment, made in 1978, and presented in USGS Circular 790, in View of the Industry experience accumulated over the intervening 26 years. Based on this analysis we offer our perspective on how such assessment may be improved.

In the design of geothermal installations, the possibility of scale precipitation caused by silica over saturation has often been taken as a design constraint upon steam separation pressure. At installations where over-saturation is allowed to develop, the resulting scale formation is a nuisance and in some cases affects the performance of injection wells. A review of the thermodynamics, reaction mechanisms, and kinetics of silica deposition, compared with actual experience at various locations, shows that it is possible to predict low-level scaling with sufficient confidence for production and injection system design. With foresight it thus becomes possible to suppress or manage the silica scale. A useful suppression technology is fluid pH reduction, achieved by mixing with noncondensible gases and/or steam condensate. Results from several geothermal systems will be presented. Further improvements of predictive technique will benefit from more uniformity in data collection, designing experiments, reporting of results, and reporting measurements of scaling in actual production systems.

Pressure decline within The Geysers geothermal reservoir has resulted in decreased power output from existing power plants. As a means of partially arresting these ,pressure declines, several field operators and the County of Lake propose to add approximately 13,000 lpm of treated municipal waste water from several small communities into 6 injection wells in the southeastern corner of the field. Water will be carried to the geothermal field via a 50- or 6O-cm diameter pipeline from the vicinity of Clear Lake, a distance of about 45 km. The results of this study suggest that the proposed injection of effluent could help reducing the high rate of pressure and production rate declines without inducing significant geochemistry incompatibility or microseismicity.